I’ve just finished reading this book. Yamazaki Tomoko is the author of “Sandakan
Brothel No. 8” and “Up to Sandakan” is her memoir that came out in 2001. The
story grabbed my attention right from the beginning and kept going until the
end.
One thing made me very interested was that her mother was also a teacher of the Japanese traditional arts, Chanoyu and flower arrangement like my mother. Some of her feeling toward her mother is similar to mine, it made me think.
I’ll comment on a few things here.
One thing made me very interested was that her mother was also a teacher of the Japanese traditional arts, Chanoyu and flower arrangement like my mother. Some of her feeling toward her mother is similar to mine, it made me think.
I’ll comment on a few things here.
In one of the scenes, the narrator
describes how she was fired from her waitress job at a coffee shop. At the time, she was married to a Korean man
in Tokyo. He came to Japan when he was very
young, and at the time she met him, he was a graduate student in Political
Science at Tokyo University. He is multilingual. Because the legal process of marrying a
Korean person during 1950s was difficult, they were common law husband and wife,
not on paper.
Anyhow, the owner of the coffee shop told
her that she was fired because the owner found out that she was married to a
Korean man. Isn’t that amazing? The narrator said to the owners, husband and
wife, “But you are both Koreans, too.”
They replied, “No, we are no longer Koreans. We became Japanese citizens. So, we cannot hire a Japanese woman who married
to a Korean man.”
Imagine that! How bizarre!
At this point, the narrator does not give her thought on this. She is speechless and totally perplexed. Me, too.
But there are more than a few points during my reading this book that I
could not really understand the feeling of the characters. I think the issue is so dark, ridiculous,
pessimistic, so twisted that nobody, both Koreans and Japanese cannot explain
how they feel. I think those confused people
are confused because their feeling is based on what they imagine what others
feel. And their imagination is so wildly
yucky dark. That’s the only explanation I can come up with.
For an example, the narrator’s uncle in
Osaka to whom she has never met in her life goes to the relative of the Korean
husband and blurts out all the prejudiced words. Of course, I can’t understand why this uncle
suddenly appears in the narrator’s life and go charging into a stranger’s
house. It’s so rude beyond any
imagination. It’s insane. But a sad thing is that the very intelligent
Korean husband, although he knows what happened at his relative house in Osaka,
never tells his wife about the incident.
She found that out later on. She
doesn’t say, but I think that had a lot to do with their breakup. You might say it’s because he tries to
protect her. No, I don’t buy that. Even if that were his intention, I think it
works opposite. For husband and wife, we
need to discuss these important matters until we are satisfied. Otherwise, how could we overcome difficulties
together?
The name of the Korean man is Kim Guantek. He was born in 1930 in Cheju island of South
Korea. He was the head of the North
Korean student movement in Japan in 1950s.
Because of much complication, she departs from him one day without letting
him know. She says she left him because she
loves him and wishes he can pursue his true passion in his life which is to
unite both North and South Korea.
I googled his name, Kim Guantek, 金光澤, but it’s strange that his name doesn’t come up. He is a scholar specialized in international
relations and North Korea. He was at
Oxford University in the summer of 1967, but suddenly he disappeared and his older
brother in South Korea has never heard from him last 30 years. The brother and his family members were
investigated by KCIA. They found nothing
and were released, but the brother had to resign from his high position in the Construction
Ministry.
6 comments:
It sounds like it was an interesting book. I wonder if the Korean man went to North Korea to live, and if that is why he seems to have "disappeared."
Kristie,
I'm sure he is welcome to North Korea.
I didn't know this "the East Berlin Incident" that happened in 1967. KCIA announced they arrested 194 with suspicion of dealing with N. Korea through the N. Korea embassy in East Berlin. Out of 194, they held 107 and sentenced with death and imprisoned for life. Arrested people were all studying or working in Europe. There were well known artists, too, and West Germany protested, and they released 17 people, I think, but I just read that one of artists has been performing much less comparing with his prior period of his career. It's sad.
I think all the sympathizers to No. Korea want to open up relationships, and intelligent people all want the unification of both countries.
Here is the link I found.
http://hunjang.blogspot.jp/2004/10/east-berlin-incident-of-1967.html
This is not a case of No. Korea abducting, but S. Korea abducted a large number of people in Europe. I hope they are alive.
Prejudice, mixed marriages, politics and religion are all complicated and fiery issues. Supposition is, as you say, difficult, without having been a fly on the wall to see both parties in action.
The book sounds fascinating...why the title Brothel No.8?
The author must feel very confident about her safety to publish now.
Secret service actions are much more difficult to research than general war stories, by virtue of the secrecy of nation states' underground work.
There is so much we don't know and will never know. What we find out through autobiographical and biographical sources can give tantalising leads.
ZACL,
Brothel No.8 was the name of the building in which Japanese comfort women used to live during WWII. It's a very sad and ugly story. We tend not to talk about it, but we should because some people still do not clearly understand that it is disgusting and criminal to take advantage of women's sexuality.
It's all complicated and dangerous, so I thought I should at least post on the subject.
I have seen a number of war films, filmed by war correspondents where the comfort stations were shown, with queues of men outside waiting their turn. Yes, it was disgusting how women were used in war, it is disgusting how sex crimes are still perpetrated in war as an additional weapon in the armoury.
There were a few women who were prepared to be interviewed on camera and talk about their life-changing experiences in the comfort stations; they were also wanting recognition of the crimes committed against them, personally, and compensation too.
I totally agree with your sentiments on this issue.
ZACL,
Thank you for your support!
Keiko
Post a Comment